Name: 
 

Tort Law Quiz Chapter 4



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

The special negligence rule that applies to trespassing children is called attractive nuisance.
 

 2. 

Licensees are persons invited onto another’s land.
 

 3. 

A landowner’s highest duty of care is owed to invitees.
 

 4. 

When vicarious liability applies, the agent is liable for the principal’s torts.
 

 5. 

Scope of employment means the range of conduct that an employer expects an employee to
perform as part of his or her job.
 

 6. 

As a general rule, employers are vicariously liable for torts committed by employees as they
come and go to work.
 

 7. 

A person who hires an independent contractor is usually liable for the independent
contractor’s torts.
 

 8. 

Many state legislatures have enacted motor vehicle vicarious liability statutes.
 

 9. 

Negligent infliction of emotional distress does not require outrageous conduct.
 

 10. 

In some jurisdictions, recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress is partially
limited to cases in which the plaintiff witnesses serious injury to a family member.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

Zevon walked into a construction site after working hours. He slipped and fell into an open
pit, injuring himself. For purposes of premises liability, Zevon would be classified as a(n)
a.
invitee.
b.
licensee.
c.
trespasser.
d.
idiot.
e.
none of the above.
 

 12. 

Hillary walked into a grocery store to buy some vegetables. As she walked down an aisle,
she slipped on some spilled milk and fell down, breaking her arm. For purposes of premises
liability, Hillary would be classified as
a.
an invitee.
b.
a licensee.
c.
a trespasser.
d.
clumsy.
e.
none of the above.
 

 13. 

Gordon is a door-to-door salesperson. As he walks to Alicia’s apartment door, he slips on a roller skate. For purposes of premises liability, Gordon would be classified as
a.
an invitee.
b.
a licensee.
c.
a trespasser.
d.
unobservant.
e.
none of the above.
 

 14. 

Keeping in mind any applicable defenses, which of the following examples best shows
negligence per se?
a.
Gail owns a restaurant. One of her customers was injured when a grease fire broke out on the grill. The local health code requires restaurants to clean food preparation surfaces daily, to prevent such fires. Gail’s grill had not been cleaned for several weeks.
b.
Paul parked his truck in a no-parking zone. Nora parked her motorcycle behind it at a parking meter. The truck jumped out of gear and rolled over the motorcycle.
c.
As Samantha crossed her neighbor’s land to reach a fishing stream, she fell into a
clearly visible abandoned well. A state statute requires landowners to seal such wells.
d.
Daniel stored a can of lighter fluid on his apartment balcony. This violated his lease.
The can overheated and exploded, burning down the building.
 

 15. 

The coming and going rule
a.
states that employers are not vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees
while they are coming to and from work.
b.
states that employers are vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees.
c.
involves independent contractors.
d.
A and C only.
 

 16. 

An independent contractor is distinguishable from an employee because
a.
an employer controls how an independent contractor performs work.
b.
an employer must deduct Social Security taxes for an independent contractor.
c.
an employer does not control how an independent contractor performs work.
d.
all of the above.
e.
none of the above.
 

 17. 

In motor vehicle consent statutes, vicarious liability is imposed on
a.
owners of vehicles for the negligence of drivers of other vehicles.
b.
pedestrians.
c.
bystanders.
d.
the owner of the vehicle for the negligence of those who drive his or her vehicle.
 

 18. 

In vicarious liability, the __________ is liable for the torts of the ___________.
a.
agent; principal
b.
defendant; plaintiff
c.
principal; agent
d.
plaintiff; defendant
e.
none of the above
 

 19. 

Respondeat superior is normally associated with which type of negligence case?
a.
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
b.
Absolute liability
c.
Premises liability
d.
Vicarious liability
e.
None of the above
 

 20. 

Which of the following topics is not associated with the scope of employment?
a.
Coming and going rule
b.
Frolic and detour rule
c.
Vicarious liability
d.
Respondeat superior
e.
All of the above are associated with scope of employment.
 

 21. 

Emotional distress includes which of the following?
a.
Mental anguish
b.
Fright
c.
Grief
d.
Embarrassment
e.
All of the above
 

 22. 

Which of the following is not associated with negligent infliction of emotional distress?
a.
Impact rule
b.
Frolic and detour rule
c.
Physical manifestations rule
d.
Zone of danger rule
e.
Sensory perception rule
 

 23. 

According to the zone of danger rule,
a.
only sports participants can recover for foul balls.
b.
only bystanders who are outside the zone of danger are responsible for negligence.
c.
only bystanders who are in the zone of danger can recover for negligent infliction of
emotional distress.
d.
bystanders cannot recover for physical harm.
 

 24. 

In actions involving negligence per se, negligence
a.
is presumed because of the tortfeasor’s violation of a statute.
b.
cannot be presumed.
c.
is presumed if injury occurs to minors.
d.
is presumed if injury occurs to persons with special relationships.
 

 25. 

Respondeat superior means
a.
the higher court responds.”
b.
the respondent is liable.”
c.
let the superior answer.”
d.
let the respondent provide.”
e.
none of the above.
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over