Name: 
 

Tort Law Quiz Chapter 3



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

An attorney will most likely refuse to take a malpractice case with damages over $100,000.
 

 2. 

Once a plaintiff has made a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the defendant.
 

 3. 

One of the elements of res ipsa loquitur is that a defendant must be shown to be more than
50% at fault.
 

 4. 

After the pleadings are served, the next step is for the plaintiff to file a demurrer.
 

 5. 

Attorneys and doctors are the only professionals who can be sued for malpractice.
 

 6. 

A hospital is responsible for the negligence of its independent contractors.
 

 7. 

Placing caps on the amount of money an injured plaintiff can collect is an example of tort
reform.
 

 8. 

Professional liability policies generally do not cover intentional acts such as fraud.
 

 9. 

Once an attorney is censured, that attorney is prohibited from practicing law.
 

 10. 

If an attorney fails to use best judgment, that in and of itself is not enough to prove
malpractice.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

Which of the following might be examples of medical malpractice?
a.
Lack of informed consent
b.
Failure to diagnose
c.
Abandonment
d.
All of the above
e.
C and D only
 

 12. 

Under res ipsa loquitur, which of the following statements is true?
a.
The defendant’s negligence is presumed.
b.
The defendant had exclusive control over the action or object that injured the plaintiff.
c.
The defendant is in the better position to prove his or her lack of negligence than the
plaintiff is to prove negligence.
d.
All of the above
e.
None of the above
 

 13. 

In which type of case would res ipsa loquitur most commonly be used?
a.
Medical malpractice
b.
Motor vehicle accidents
c.
Slip-and-fall injuries
d.
All of the above
e.
None of the above
 

 14. 

The party bringing an action
a.
has no obligation to prove the case.
b.
has the burden of proof.
c.
can choose who has the burden of proof.
d.
none of the above.
 

 15. 

The burden of proof in a negligence action is usually proof
a.
to a certain degree.
b.
beyond a reasonable doubt.
c.
with a reasonable degree of doubt.
d.
by a preponderance of the evidence.
 

 16. 

When the burden of proof shifts to the defendant, it is called the burden of
a.
difficulty.
b.
innocence.
c.
persuasion or rejoinder.
d.
persuasion, and the burden of doubt.
e.
none of the above.
 

 17. 

Violation of a statute
a.
affects all negligence actions.
b.
has no effect on negligence actions.
c.
may have an effect on a negligence action if the injured was the kind of person the
statute was designed to protect.
d.
means negligence for a defendant.
 

 18. 

In most states, violation of a statute is
a.
negligence per se.
b.
negligence ipsa.
c.
negligence in the zone of danger.
d.
negligence outside the zone of danger.
 

 19. 

For the most part, medical malpractice cases are
a.
cheap, quick, and easy to try.
b.
very costly and require expert witnesses.
c.
the easiest kind of case to try.
d.
none of the above.
 

 20. 

Tort reform is an effort by the legislature to
a.
increase the costs of legal actions.
b.
make it easier to sue people.
c.
reduce the amount and kinds of rewards people receive in legal actions.
d.
none of the above.
 

 21. 

A certificate of merit
a.
is the court’s stamp of approval.
b.
is issued by a panel of three attorneys.
c.
costs $350 in most jurisdictions.
d.
is issued by the judge.
e.
is issued by a medical physician.
 

 22. 

Legal malpractice occurs when a(n)
a.
student fails a test in law school.
b.
student fails the bar examination.
c.
attorney falls below the standard of care required.
d.
attorney uses an unpopular legal strategy.
 

 23. 

The majority of states follow
a.
the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
b.
Dillon’s law of malpractice.
c.
the Statewide Rules and Procedures for Malpractice.
d.
the same rules of malpractice that were in place 200 years ago.
e.
none of the above.
 

 24. 

The statute of limitations for bringing a legal malpractice action is
a.
is one year.
b.
is two years.
c.
is the same for all jurisdictions.
d.
varies by jurisdiction.
e.
is the same as for bringing an intentional tort action.
 

 25. 

An attorney must never
a.
give bonuses to employees.
b.
split fees with other attorneys.
c.
keeps the firm’s money separate from the clients’ money.
d.
commingle client funds with law firm funds.
 

 26. 

The attorney/client relationship is
a.
the same as the employer/employee relationship.
b.
a fiduciary relationship.
c.
a relationship that has been disengaged.
d.
none of the above.
 

 27. 

In a malpractice action, the “case within a case” is
a.
the expert’s opinion.
b.
the original case.
c.
the weaker of the two cases.
d.
the stronger of the two cases.
e.
never the underlying case.
 

 28. 

Rosemary wakes up from surgery with a pair of scissors in her stomach; her attorney most
likely will
a.
decide there was no malpractice because of res ipsa loquitur.
b.
proceed with her case using the theory of res ipsa loquitur.
c.
avoid the burden of persuasion.
d.
refuse to obtain a certificate of merit or go before a malpractice panel.
e.
none of the above.
 

 29. 

Eric and Vivian, who have been engaged for one year, build a house but refuse to obtain the
necessary building permit before beginning construction. They don’t want the inspector to
see that they are not following code law and are using substandard, cheap materials. Two
months later, after the house is sold to Georgia, the house cracks in the middle, injuring
Georgia and her dog. Georgia’s attorney will have her strongest argument in claiming which
of the following?
a.
violation of a statute, and negligence per se
b.
burden of rejoinder
c.
indemnity rules
d.
malpractice
e.
none of the above
 

 30. 

A negligence claim is typically proven through
a.
oral testimony.
b.
written transcripts of discovery.
c.
photos and videos.
d.
all of the above.
e.
none of the above.
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over