Name: 
 

Tort Law Chapter 3 Quiz



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

The special negligence rule that applies to trespassing children is called attractive nuisance.
 

 2. 

Licensees are persons invited onto another’s land.
 

 3. 

A landowner’s highest duty or care is owed to invitees.
 

 4. 

The agent is liable for the principal’s torts under vicarious liability.
 

 5. 

Scope of employment means the range of conduct that an employer expects an employee to perform as part of his or her job.
 

 6. 

Employers are vicariously liable for torts committed by employees as they come and go to work, as a general rule.
 

 7. 

A person who hires an independent contractor is usually liable for the independent contractor’s torts.
 

 8. 

Many state legislatures have enacted motor vehicle vicarious liability statutes.
 

 9. 

Negligent infliction of emotional distress does not require outrageous conduct.
 

 10. 

In some jurisdictions, recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress is partially limited to cases in which the plaintiff witnesses serious injury to a family member.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

Zevon walked into a construction site after working hours. He slipped and fell into an open pit, injuring himself. For purposes of premises liability, Zevon would be classified as a(n)
a.
Invitee
b.
Licensee
c.
Trespasser
d.
Idiot
e.
None of the above
 

 12. 

Hillary walked into a grocery store to buy some vegetables. As she walked down an aisle, she slipped on some spilled milk and fell down, breaking her arm. For purposes of premises liability, Hillary would be classified as a(n)
a.
Invitee
b.
Licensee
c.
Trespasser
d.
Clumsy
e.
None of the above
 

 13. 

Gordon is a door-to-door salesperson. As he walks to Alicia’s apartment door, he slips on a roller skate. For purposes of premises liability, Gordon would be classified as a(n)
a.
Invitee
b.
Licensee
c.
Trespasser
d.
Unobservant
e.
None of the above
 

 14. 

Keeping in mind any applicable defenses, which of the following examples best shows negligence per se?
a.
Gail owns a restaurant. One of her customers was injured when a grease fire broke out on the grill. The local health code requires restaurants to clean food preparation surfaces daily. Gail’s grill had not been cleaned for several weeks.
b.
Paul parked his truck in a no-parking zone. Nora parked her motorcycle behind it at a parking meter. The truck jumped out of gear and rolled over the motorcycle.
c.
As Samantha crossed her neighbor’s land to reach a fishing stream, she fell into a clearly visible abandoned well. A state statute requires landowners to seal such wells.
d.
Daniel stored a can of lighter fluid on his apartment balcony. This violated his lease. The can overheated and exploded, burning the building.
e.
None of the above
 

 15. 

In the coming and going rule,
a.
Employers are not vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees.
b.
Employers are vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees.
c.
This is the same as the frolic and detour rule.
d.
None of the above.
 

 16. 

An independent contractor is distinguishable from an employee because
a.
An employer controls how an independent contract performs work.
b.
An employer must deduct social security taxes for an independent contractor.
c.
All of the above.
d.
An employer does not control how an independent contractor performs work.
e.
None of the above.
 

 17. 

In motor vehicle consent statutes,
a.
Vicarious liability is imposed on owners of vehicles for the negligence of drivers of other vehicles.
b.
Vicarious liability is imposed on pedestrians.
c.
Vicarious liability is imposed on bystanders.
d.
Vicarious liability is imposed on the owner of the vehicle for negligence of those who drive their vehicle.
 

 18. 

In vicarious liability, the ________ is liable for the torts of the _______.
a.
agent; principal
b.
defendant; plaintiff
c.
principal; agent
d.
plaintiff; defendant
e.
none of the above
 

 19. 

Respondeat superior is normally associated with which type of negligence case?
a.
Negligent infliction of emotional distress.
b.
Absolute liability.
c.
Premises liability.
d.
Vicarious liability.
e.
None of the above.
 

 20. 

Which of the following is not associated with the scope of employment?
a.
Coming and going rule.
b.
Frolic and detour rule.
c.
Independent contractors.
d.
Respondeat superior
e.
All of the above are associated with scope of employment.
 

 21. 

Emotional distress includes which of the following?
a.
Mental anguish.
b.
Fright.
c.
Grief.
d.
Embarrassment.
e.
All of the above.
 

 22. 

Which of the following is not associated with negligent infliction of emotional distress?
a.
The impact rule.
b.
The frolic and detour rule.
c.
The physical manifestations rule.
d.
The zone of danger rule.
e.
The sensory perception rule.
 

 23. 

In the zone of danger rule,
a.
Only sports participants can recover for foul balls.
b.
Only bystanders who are outside the zone of danger are responsible for negligence.
c.
Only bystanders who are in the zone of danger can recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
d.
Bystanders cannot recover for physical harm.
 

 24. 

In negligence per se,
a.
Negligence is presumed because of the tortfeasor’s violation of a statute.
b.
Negligence cannot be presumed.
c.
Negligence is presumed if injury occurs to minors.
d.
Negligence is presumed if injury occurs to persons with special relationships.
 

 25. 

Respondeat superior means
a.
The higher court responds.
b.
The respondent is liable.
c.
Let the superior answer.
d.
Let the respondent provide.
e.
None of the above.
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over