Name: 
 

Juvenile Law Chapter 4 Quiz



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

The law surrounding interrogation is relatively recent and small.
 

 2. 

When the Supreme Court decided Miranda in 1966 it only applied to adult criminal defendants.
 

 3. 

The Supreme Court has never recognized any special status for juvenile offenders.
 

 4. 

While juveniles are now afforded the same rights as adults, they are afforded no special or extra rights.
 

 5. 

The issues of interrogation techniques, waiver, and the right against self-incrimination are particularly important in juvenile law because many delinquency cases involve confessions and inculpatory statements.
 

 6. 

Constitutional challenges to statements juveniles make while in custody are rare.
 

 7. 

All states have a rule requiring the presence of a parent or other adult during any interrogation of a person under a certain age, usually 14, unless the juvenile knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives the right to have such an adult present.
 

 8. 

The first consideration in evaluating a juvenile’s confession or inculpatory statement is to determine whether the juvenile was indeed in custody when he made the statements.
 

 9. 

If the juvenile asks for an attorney, the police must immediately halt all questioning until the attorney arrives.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 10. 

Interrogation is
a.
The informal questioning of a suspect at the scene of a crime
b.
The formal questioning of a suspected offender by the police while the offender is in custody
c.
The questioning that takes place inside a courtroom
d.
The questioning that takes place at arraignment
 

 11. 

One of the most important cases on the subject of interrogation is
a.
Baird v. Bellotti
b.
Roe v. Wade
c.
Marbury v. Madison
d.
Miranda v. Arizona
 

 12. 

In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court held that suspects in custody had the right
a.
To remain silent
b.
To the attorney of their choice, even if they were indigent
c.
To be released on their recognizance at any time
d.
To reasonable bail
 

 13. 

In Application of Gault, the Supreme Court held that
a.
Miranda did not apply to juveniles
b.
Miranda did not apply to criminal suspects
c.
Miranda applied to juveniles
d.
Miranda was no longer good law
 

 14. 

The only difference between the way courts treat adults and the way they treat juveniles in terms of interrogations is that
a.
Police are not allowed to interrogate juveniles
b.
The state can only interrogate juveniles in a courtroom
c.
Juveniles receive special warnings
d.
Some states allow or require an interested, concerned, independent adult to be present during the interrogation proceedings if an attorney is not present
 

 15. 

Through his research, Professor Thomas Grisso discovered that many juveniles and adults
a.
Do not understand a single word of the Miranda warnings
b.
Do not understand many of the key concepts and terms contained in the Miranda warnings
c.
Have no problem understanding the Miranda warnings
d.
Have never heard of the Miranda warnings
 

 16. 

Miranda considerations only apply when a juvenile
a.
Has actually committed a delinquent act
b.
When a juvenile is in court
c.
When a juvenile is being arraigned
d.
When a juvenile is in custody
 

 17. 

In order to avail themselves of their rights under Miranda, juvenile must
a.
Do nothing—the automatically apply
b.
Affirmatively assert their rights
c.
Not specifically waive their rights
d.
Appear with an attorney
 

 18. 

Any waiver of rights must be made
a.
Knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
b.
After consulting with the judge
c.
After consulting with the prosecutor
d.
After consulting with an adult
 

Essay
 

 19. 

What is the substance of the Miranda warnings?
 

 20. 

What are some factors courts consider in assessing whether a juvenile has made a valid waiver?
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over