Name: 
 

Criminal Law Chapter 6 Quiz



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

The purpose of the arraignment is to inform the defendant of the charges against him.
 

 2. 

Most criminal cases end in the defendant’s plea of guilty.
 

 3. 

In some states, the defendant’s presence at court is secured through a bail bond.
 

 4. 

When a person fails to appear at court, the judge is allowed to enter a conviction against
him.
 

 5. 

In some states, changes in the criminal discovery rules compel the state to turn over witness
statements, investigative reports, and police reports to the defense.
 

 6. 

A defense attorney can plead his client guilty without his client’s consent
 

 7. 

When a person pleads “no lo contendere,” he is pleading not guilty.
 

 8. 

Depositions are required in criminal cases.
 

 9. 

Through discovery, a defense attorney can get copies of the prosecutor’s work product.
 

 10. 

The Brady decision requires the government to produce exculpatory information to the
defense no matter what the state law says about discovery issues.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

The name for the hearing where the defendant is told about official charges against him or
her, given a copy of the indictment or accusation, and provided with some discovery is
a.
the initial appearance.
b.
the arraignment.
c.
the jury charge.
d.
the sentencing hearing.
 

 12. 

When a prosecutor offers a lower sentence and fine to a defendant in exchange for a guilty
plea, this is called
a.
plea bargaining.
b.
sentence enhancement.
c.
mitigating factors.
d.
Brady material.
 

 13. 

All of the following are reasons that a defendant would plead guilty to a crime, except
a.
that he or she might receive a harsher sentence after trial than if he or she pleads guilty before trial.
b.
that the evidence against him or her is overwhelming.
c.
that the state has threatened him or her.
d.
that the defendant is worried that the jury will convict him or her.
 

 14. 

When a defense attorney wishes to exclude the defendant’s statement to the police, he or she will often file a
a.
Brady motion.
b.
motion to dismiss.
c.
motion to suppress.
d.
motion to “reveal the deal.”
 

 15. 

When the state wishes to introduce evidence of the defendant’s other crimes that have
characteristics in common with the crime the defendant has committed in the present case,
the prosecutor will file a
a.
similar transactions motion.
b.
motion to suppress.
c.
motion to exculpate.
d.
Brady motion.
 

 16. 

When the judge reviews the state’s materials to see that the state has complied with the
defendant’s discovery requests, this is called
a.
an open file procedure.
b.
a Giglio procedure.
c.
in Camera review.
d.
a Miranda review.
 

 17. 

Paul Prosecutor has offered a recommended sentence of probation to Carl, the defendant, as part of a negotiated plea of guilty. When they present this plea bargain to the judge, the judge refuses to impose the negotiated sentence. What can Carl do at this point?
a.
Carl has no choice; he must plead guilty.
b.
Carl can sue to force the prosecutor to impose the sentence that was negotiated.
c.
Carl can sue the judge to enforce the sentence that was negotiated.
d.
Carl can withdraw his guilty plea and go to trial.
 

 18. 

When the defense wishes to know additional information about the crimes alleged in the
indictment, it can file a
a.
bill of particulars.
b.
motion to quash.
c.
motion to suppress.
d.
motion to compel discovery.
 

 19. 

Carl wishes to plead guilty, even though he maintains that he is innocent. He realizes,
however, that the evidence against him is overwhelming and that if he goes to trial, he will
be found guilty. What can Carl do?
a.
He cannot enter a plea under these circumstances.
b.
He can plead guilty under the Alford case.
c.
He cannot plead guilty because no judge would accept his reasons.
d.
He can plead guilty under the Brady decision.
 

 20. 

Carl’s attorney advises Carl to plead guilty because the evidence against him is
overwhelming. However, Carl is stubborn. At trial, the defense attorney announces that
although Carl does not wish to plead guilty, he will have to plead his client guilty over
Carl’s objections because going to trial will be much worse for Carl than it would be to
plead guilty before the trial starts. What does the judge do?
a.
Accept the plea of guilty under an Alford plea.
b.
Accept the plea of guilty under the doctrine of no lo contendere.
c.
Deny the plea because Carl did not consent to it.
d.
Deny the plea because the defense attorney did not confer with the state.
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over