Name: 
 

CrimLaw Chapter 5 Quiz



True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

Carl is arrested, but no one reads him his Miranda rights. His arrest is illegal and he will be set free.
 

 2. 

Miranda rights are a requirement imposed by Federal statutes.
 

 3. 

During his interrogation, Carl asks to speak with his lawyer. The police can continue to question him.
 

 4. 

During his interrogation, the police lie to Carl, telling him that his fingerprints were found at the scene. This is a permissible tactic.
 

 5. 

In order to fool Carl, the police have him sign a document that purports to be a “Release of Suspect’s Property,” when in fact it is a consent to search form. This is a permissible tactic.
 

 6. 

Carl decides to give a voluntary statement to the police. No one reads him his Miranda rights. Carl’s statement can be admitted at trial.
 

 7. 

During his interrogation, police promise Carl that if he confesses to committing the crime, the judge will only give him probation and a fine. Carl confesses. This confession was obtained unconstitutionally.
 

 8. 

During his interrogation, police threaten Carl with being locked up without food and water until he confesses. Carl confesses. The confession was obtained unconstitutionally.
 

 9. 

During his interrogation, police offer to speak with the judge and tell the judge that Carl was cooperative. Carl subsequently confesses. The statement is unconstitutional.
 

 10. 

Psychological profiling of a suspect is unconstitutional.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

All of the following are exceptions to the rule that Miranda rights must be read to a suspect, except:
a.
Voluntary statements
b.
Exigent circumstances
c.
Defendant’s demeanor
d.
Traffic stops
 

 12. 

Which of the following may indicate that a suspect is not telling the truth?
a.
long delays before answering a question
b.
body language cues, such as failure to look questioner in the eye
c.
inconsistencies in the suspect’s story
d.
all of the above
 

 13. 

Sam is being interrogated by the police and says, “I don’t want to answer any more questions. I want to speak to my lawyer.” Which of the following is the correct response of the interrogating officers?
a.
“Your lawyer will be here in a few minutes. Tell us more about what happened the night of the crime.”
b.
“What makes you think you need a lawyer? You’re not guilty, are you?”
c.
“Okay, your lawyer is coming. A real man wouldn’t need to hide behind a lawyer. A real man would tell the truth.”
d.
“Okay, we’re done.”
 

 14. 

This is the hearing designed to prove that the defendant’s statement was given freely and voluntarily.
a.
Jackson v. Denno hearing
b.
Motion to Dismiss
c.
Motion for directed verdict
d.
Gideon v. Wainwright motion
 

 15. 

At what point is a person officially ‘under arrest?’
a.
when he believes that he is under arrest
b.
when the officer believes that he is under arrest
c.
when a reasonable person would believe that he is under arrest
d.
when a judge declares that an arrest has been made
 

 16. 

When a defendant confesses to a crime, what must the state show before the jury can hear this confession?
a.
that it was freely given
b.
that it was not coerced
c.
that no promises were made to the suspect to get him to confess
d.
all of the above
 

 17. 

What is the sanction for violating Miranda?
a.
the statement will be suppressed
b.
the officer will be fined
c.
the case will be dismissed
d.
there are no consequences to violating Miranda
 

 18. 

Police arrive at the scene of a reported shooting and find a bleeding victim and a man standing nearby. He is not armed. Police rush up to him and demand, “Where is the gun?” The man points at a nearby garbage can and says, “I threw it in there.” Will the man’s statement be admissible at trial?
a.
No, because police did not read him his Miranda rights
b.
No, because the man did not make an incriminating statement
c.
Yes, because the man was not under suspicion at the time
d.
Yes, because Miranda does not apply to exigent circumstances
 

 19. 

Why is the “Christian burial” case so important?
a.
It shows that the police are not allowed to question a suspect after his arrest
b.
It shows that the police are not allowed to escort a suspect without the suspect’s lawyer being present
c.
It shows that the police cannot continue to elicit testimony from a person who has expressed the right to remain silent.
d.
It shows that where there are exigent circumstances, police can trick a suspect into confessing
 

 20. 

During an interrogation, police ask the suspect, “what have you and your lawyer had to say to one another about this case?” Is this question permissible?
a.
Yes, because the suspect’s lawyer is not present
b.
Yes, because the suspect is free to answer or not, as he sees fit
c.
No, because the any conversations between client and lawyer are legally protected
d.
No, because there is no showing that the police needed this information
 



 
Check Your Work     Start Over