IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE SALLY SUE, Plaintiff(s), v. SAM SLIME, Defendant(s). DOCKET NO. COMPLAINT Comes now the Plaintiff(s), SALLY SUE, and for cause of action against the Defendant(s), SAM SLIME, complains and alleges as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS I. Plaintiff(s) is and at all times relevant has been a resident of Knox County, Tennessee. II. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe that Defendant(s) are residents and citizens of the State of Tennessee. III. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were the owners of that certain taxicab, identification number 1874. IV. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were the owners of that certain passenger transportation vehicle. V. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid taxicab, with the permission and consent of Defendant(s). VI. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid passenger transport vehicle, with the permission and consent of Defendant(s). VII. Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned, each of the Defendant(s) were the agent, servant, and employee of the remaining Defendant(s), and at all times herein mentioned, each was acting within the time, place and scope of said agency and employment. VIII. On or about June 28, 1997, Plaintiff(s), were the passengers of the taxicab which was traveling westbound in on an alleyway that runs between “ Hilton Hotel” and “ Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee. IX. On or about June 28, 1997, Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid taxicab, in which Plaintiff(s) were passengers. X. On or about June 28, 1997, Defendant(s), and DOES 31 through 40 were driving the aforesaid passenger transport vehicle within the alleyway that runs between “Hilton Hotel” and “Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee. XI. At all times herein mentioned, the alleyway that runs between “Hilton Hotel” and “Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee, was an open and public street and highway. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION XII. Plaintiff(s) hereby reallege and incorporate by reference Paragraphs I through XII, inclusive, as if set out in full herein. XIII. At the said time and place, Defendant(s) inclusive, did so negligently and carelessly own, operate, maintain, manage, control, and entrust their respective automobile so as to cause the same to strike each other and thereby proximately caused the hereinafter described injuries and damages to Plaintiff(s). XIV. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) were injured in their health strength and activity, sustaining severe shock and injury to their nervous system and person, and causing Plaintiff(s) mental, physical and nervous pain and suffering and resulting in their disability, all to their general damage in a sum which exceeds $10,000.00 and will be shown according to proof. XV. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) were compelled to and did incur expenses for medical care, hospitalization, and other incidental expenses and will have to incur additional like expenses in the future, all in amounts presently unknown to them. Plaintiff(s) therefore asks leave of Court either to amend this complaint so as to show the amount of their medical expenses, when ascertained, or to prove said amount at the time of trial. XVI. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) was disabled and may be disabled in the future and thereby be prevented from attending to the duties of their usual occupation. Plaintiff(s) have therefore lost earnings and may continue to lose earnings in the future, all in amounts presently unknown to him. Plaintiff(s) asks leave of Court either to show the amount of their lost earnings, when ascertained, or to prove said amount at the time of trial. XVII. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, the said vehicle and other property owned and/or used by Plaintiff(s) was damaged; and Plaintiff(s) thereafter was denied the use of said vehicle and other property, to Plaintiff(s)'s further damage all in amounts which will be shown according to proof. XVIII. It has been necessary for Plaintiff(s) to retain the services of the law firm of Ryder, McWhorter & Caspino to prosecute this action, and Plaintiff(s) are entitled to be awarded attorney’s fees and costs, as well as prejudgment interest. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Against All Defendants) XX. Plaintiff(s) hereby reallege and incorporate by reference Paragraphs I through XIX, inclusive, as if set out in full herein. XXI. Defendant(s), and each of them owed a duty to the users of the public roadways to operate their vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner. XXII. Defendant(s), and each of them, breached that duty by acts and omissions including, but not limited to, inattentive driving and operating their vehicle at an unsafe speed in consideration of the traffic on the roadway, unsafe turning, and unsafe lane changes. XXIII. As a direct and proximate result of the acts and omissions of Defendant(s) as herein alleged, said Defendant(s) did cause their vehicles to collide, involving the vehicle in which Plaintiff(s), user of the public roadways, was riding. XXIV. As a direct and proximate result of the vehicular collision between Defendant(s)' vehicles, Plaintiff(s) have been caused injury as alleged in Paragraphs XV through XIX / / / / / / / / / WHEREFORE, Plaintiff(s) prays for judgment against the Defendant(s), and each of them as follows: 1. For general damages according to proof, 2. For loss of earnings and earning capacity according to proof, 3. For medical expenses, future medical expenses and all incidental expenses according to proof, 4. For interest from the date of accident to the time of judgment; 5. For costs of suit incurred herein; 6. For attorney fees incurred herein, and 7. For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper. DATED this ____ day of June, 2008. Atty. Name Attorney Bar No. 6779 Address Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE
SALLY SUE,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
SAM SLIME,
Defendant(s).
DOCKET NO.
COMPLAINT
Comes now the Plaintiff(s), SALLY SUE, and for cause of action against the Defendant(s), SAM SLIME, complains and alleges as follows:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
I.
Plaintiff(s) is and at all times relevant has been a resident of Knox County, Tennessee.
II.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe that Defendant(s) are residents and citizens of the State of Tennessee.
III.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were the owners of that certain taxicab, identification number 1874.
IV.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were the owners of that certain passenger transportation vehicle.
V.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid taxicab, with the permission and consent of Defendant(s).
VI.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid passenger transport vehicle, with the permission and consent of Defendant(s).
VII.
Plaintiff(s) are informed and believe and thereon allege that at all times herein mentioned, each of the Defendant(s) were the agent, servant, and employee of the remaining Defendant(s), and at all times herein mentioned, each was acting within the time, place and scope of said agency and employment.
VIII.
On or about June 28, 1997, Plaintiff(s), were the passengers of the taxicab which was traveling westbound in on an alleyway that runs between “ Hilton Hotel” and “ Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee.
IX.
On or about June 28, 1997, Defendant(s) were driving the aforesaid taxicab, in which Plaintiff(s) were passengers.
X.
On or about June 28, 1997, Defendant(s), and DOES 31 through 40 were driving the aforesaid passenger transport vehicle within the alleyway that runs between “Hilton Hotel” and “Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee.
XI.
At all times herein mentioned, the alleyway that runs between “Hilton Hotel” and “Palace Hotel” in the County of Knox State of Tennessee, was an open and public street and highway.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
XII.
Plaintiff(s) hereby reallege and incorporate by reference Paragraphs I through XII, inclusive, as if set out in full herein.
XIII.
At the said time and place, Defendant(s) inclusive, did so negligently and carelessly own, operate, maintain, manage, control, and entrust their respective automobile so as to cause the same to strike each other and thereby proximately caused the hereinafter described injuries and damages to Plaintiff(s).
XIV.
As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) were injured in their health strength and activity, sustaining severe shock and injury to their nervous system and person, and causing Plaintiff(s) mental, physical and nervous pain and suffering and resulting in their disability, all to their general damage in a sum which exceeds $10,000.00 and will be shown according to proof.
XV.
As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) were compelled to and did incur expenses for medical care, hospitalization, and other incidental expenses and will have to incur additional like expenses in the future, all in amounts presently unknown to them. Plaintiff(s) therefore asks leave of Court either to amend this complaint so as to show the amount of their medical expenses, when ascertained, or to prove said amount at the time of trial.
XVI.
As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, Plaintiff(s) was disabled and may be disabled in the future and thereby be prevented from attending to the duties of their usual occupation. Plaintiff(s) have therefore lost earnings and may continue to lose earnings in the future, all in amounts presently unknown to him. Plaintiff(s) asks leave of Court either to show the amount of their lost earnings, when ascertained, or to prove said amount at the time of trial.
XVII.
As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), and each of them, the said vehicle and other property owned and/or used by Plaintiff(s) was damaged; and Plaintiff(s) thereafter was denied the use of said vehicle and other property, to Plaintiff(s)'s further damage all in amounts which will be shown according to proof.
XVIII.
It has been necessary for Plaintiff(s) to retain the services of the law firm of Ryder, McWhorter & Caspino to prosecute this action, and Plaintiff(s) are entitled to be awarded attorney’s fees and costs, as well as prejudgment interest.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against All Defendants)
XX.
Plaintiff(s) hereby reallege and incorporate by reference Paragraphs I through XIX, inclusive, as if set out in full herein.
XXI.
Defendant(s), and each of them owed a duty to the users of the public roadways to operate their vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner.
XXII.
Defendant(s), and each of them, breached that duty by acts and omissions including, but not limited to, inattentive driving and operating their vehicle at an unsafe speed in consideration of the traffic on the roadway, unsafe turning, and unsafe lane changes.
XXIII.
As a direct and proximate result of the acts and omissions of Defendant(s) as herein alleged, said Defendant(s) did cause their vehicles to collide, involving the vehicle in which Plaintiff(s), user of the public roadways, was riding.
XXIV.
As a direct and proximate result of the vehicular collision between Defendant(s)' vehicles, Plaintiff(s) have been caused injury as alleged in Paragraphs XV through XIX
/ / /
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff(s) prays for judgment against the Defendant(s), and each of them as follows:
1. For general damages according to proof,
2. For loss of earnings and earning capacity according to proof,
3. For medical expenses, future medical expenses and all incidental expenses according to proof,
4. For interest from the date of accident to the time of judgment;
5. For costs of suit incurred herein;
6. For attorney fees incurred herein, and
7. For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.
DATED this ____ day of June, 2008.
Atty. Name
Attorney Bar No. 6779
Address
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Remember to frequently copy your work and paste it into a Microsoft Word document as a back up. Reformatting may be required when pasting the above into a Word document, including double spacing.